Форум » Дискуссии » " Malokalibernie" raketi s Yabch » Ответить

" Malokalibernie" raketi s Yabch

milstar: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yomsUqlCVgo Boewaja nagruzka Tu-160 12 AS-15 kent A s jabch 200 kt ,dalnost' 2500 km , wes 1200kg 6040*514 mm MKB raduga http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS-15_Kent No pri tochnom popadanii w avianosec 200 kt ne nuzno ,1 kt dostatochno snizenie massi boewoj chasti ymenschit gabariti raketi i ee wes pri prochix rawnix Wiigrisch Malozametnost' i w 2-4 raza bolsche raket pri prochix rawnix ################################################## Nize budut rassmotrenni wse tipi raket dlja aviazii ,tankow ,artillerii i t.d. Other developments also continued. In 1958 a fusion warhead was developed and tested, the UCRL Swift. It was 622 mm long, 127 mm diameter, and weighed 43.5 kg. At its test it yielded only 190 tons; ################ W33 for use in a 203 mm shell. Around 2,000 warheads of this type were manufactured from 1957-65. Each XM422 projectile was 940 mm long and had an as-fired weight of 243 pounds. (the standard HE shell weighed some 90 kg). XM422 were fitted with a triple deck mechanical time base fuze. They were fired from a standard 8-inch (203 mm) howitzer, either the towed M115 or self-propelled M110. In some NATO armies these were in specialist units. The W33's four yields were greater than the W48's. XM422 projectiles were assembled in the field to provide the required yield, 2, 10 .33 or 1.1KT 10 kilotonn eto 203 mm po rabotam 50-letnej dawnosti http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_artillery As well as linear implosion devices, the US developed a spherical implosion device that was very close to the theoretical lower limit of nuclear weapon yield and size. The Mk-54 Davy Crockett was designed to be fired from the M-388 recoilless rifle. Weighing only 23 kg, the warhead in its casing was 400 mm by 273 mm. It was first tested in October 1958 as part of Operation Hardtack and yielded 10 tons, but later developments increased that to 1 kiloton. 400 Mk-54 warheads were produced from 1961-65 and the last was withdrawn in 1971. The warhead was also adapted for the Mk-54 SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munition), a cylinder 40 cm by 60 cm and weighing 68 kg. It was emplaced by hand and initiated by a mechanical timer, it had a variable yield from 10 tons up to 1 kiloton. 300 SADMs were made and they remained in the US arsenal until 1989. [edit] Standard operational nuclear projectiles 152 mm projectile ZBV3 for self-propelled guns 2S19 Msta-S, 2S3 Acacia, 2S5 Giatsint-S, towed gun D-20, 2A36 Giatsint-B, and 2A65 Msta-B. The yield was 1 kiloton, maximum range 17.4 km. The nuclear weapon was designated RFYAC-VNIITF and designed by academician E. I. Zababahina in Snezhinsk. 180 mm projectile ZBV1 for S-23, MK-3-180 (originally a coast artillery piece), maximum range 45 km. 203 mm projectile ZBV2 for self-propelled gun 2S7 Pion, and towed howitzer B-4M, range from 18 km to 30 km. 240 mm projectile ZBV4 for mortar M-240 and self-propelled 2S4 Tulip. Normal maximum range 9.5 km, and 18 km with rocket assistance.

Ответов - 141, стр: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 All

milstar: В любом случае, когда мобильные «Тополя-М» и «Ярсы» несут боевое дежурство на полевых боевых стартовых позициях, они все больше видны для космических аппаратов, оснащенных радарами с синтезированной апертурой. Последние способны распознавать изменения в рельефе местности высотой до пяти сантиметров, и как не прячь пусковую, ее высота в вывешенном положении составляет примерно шесть метров. Такое изменение высоты рельефа не скроешь никакими средствами маскировки. Вопрос только в частоте облета конкретной местности спутниками с SAR-возможностями, что пока зависит от количества космических аппаратов данного типа на орбите. 1. Dannie sputniki stojat bolee 1 mlrd $ 2. Oni trebujut srawnitelno nizkoj orbiti .Sbit ix Sowetskoj ASAT na MiG-31 bez bolschix problem oni tjazeli i slabomanewrenni 3. SAR/ISAR trebue bolschoj polosi signala 100 mm razreschenie 2500 mgz Chem bolsche polosa ,tem legche gluschit ############################ 4. W sluschae obmena yadernimi ydarami i bez takowogo mozno gluschit podriwom Yabch s posledujuschej ionizaciej atmosferi

milstar: Lacrosse uses Synthetic Aperture Radar as its prime imaging instrument.[4][5] It is able to see through cloud cover and also has some ability to penetrate soil, though there have been more powerful instruments deployed in space for this specific purpose. Early versions are believed to have used the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) to relay imagery to a ground station at White Sands, New Mexico[citation needed]. There are some indications that other relay satellites may now be available for use with Lacrosse. The name "Lacrosse" is used to refer to all variants, while "Onyx" is sometimes used to refer to the three newer units[citation needed]. Unit costs (including launch) in 1990 dollars are estimated to be in the range of US $ 0.5 to 1.0 billion (inflation adjusted US$ 0.84 to 1.68 billion in 2011).[6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lacrosse_%28satellite%29 Future It has been said[citation needed] that the B-2 bomber was originally intended to use directly down-linked targeting data from Lacrosse satellites in order to aid it in its role of hunting down and destroying Soviet mobile ICBM launchers. It had been anticipated that the Lacrosse satellites would be replaced by the radar component of the Future Imagery Architecture (FIA). The severe program problems encountered by FIA in the early 2000s appear to have led to off-loading of radar reconnaissance to the Space Based Radar, later simplified to Space Radar, with initial launch anticipated around 2015.[7] This program itself was axed by Congress late 2008.[5] The launch of NROL-41 (USA 215) in September 2010 has all orbital characteristics of a radar remote sensing platform (see FIA) and could be the first of a Lacrosse follow-up program. It's orbit is a retrograde version of the "frozen" Lacrosse orbit,[8] the choice for a retrograde orbit itself indicating a SAR role.[9]

milstar: * Lacrosse 5: o Launch: April 30, 2005 o Platform: Titan IV-B o Pad: Cape Canaveral o Orbital apogee/perigee/inclination: 718 × 712 km @ 57.0° ############################################# o Mass: 16,000 kg ################### o Status: In active service o NORAD Number: 28646 (USA 182) 2005-016A o Notes: Lacrosse 5 appears to differ somewhat from the previous four satellites. As determined by amateur observers, there are subtle differences in its orbit and its color is somewhat whiter than the distinct red-orange tint of the earlier ones. Most strikingly, it sometimes fades from brightness to invisibility within the space of a few seconds while still in full sunlight. (The amateurs call this rapid fade its "disappearing trick".) The Lacrosses move in orbital planes either 68° or 57° inclined. These orbital inclinations of 68° and 57°, combined with their altitude give the satellites a complete view of the earth's surface, including the poles.


milstar: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-Cruise-Missiles.html Bramos/Yahont KR Na SU-27/30 8metrow ,3000 kg 200-250 kg + 89 kg RGSN Xoroschij wopros tex ze gabartitov ballisticheskaja (pusk na wisote 15km) Boewaja nagruzka 17-18 kg =1 kt + inerzionalnij datchik - do 10 kg kakowa budet dalnost poleta ? ########################## The Granit-Elektron seeker for the Yakhont family of missiles is one of the most sophisticated Russian digital designs seen to date. The manufacturer describes the monopulse seeker as providing a dual mode active and passive anti-radiation homing capability. In active mode the seeker provides a wideband frequency agile waveform with a pseudorandomly varied spread spectrum modulation. The design is claimed to be resistant to chaff and a number of angle/range deception jamming techniques. The seeker can acquire and track targets in sea states up to 7. Mini -ICBM s razmerami Moskit (toze mozet bit w komplektazii Su-30-33) imeet wes 4.150 kg ,9.385 metra * 0.8 metra ############################################################################# Persching 1 w texnologii 1960 goda 10.5 *1.02 metra 4700 kg 27 kg na poljarnuju 200 km = 50-60 kg na 8000-10000 km ################################################################################## pri strte Zemli ! ############## pri starte s wisoti 15 km s samoleta wozmoznij wiigrisch po sokrascheniju startowoj massi raketi pri tom ze zabrasiwaemom budet 10-20% ########################################################################################## The Raduga 3M80, 3M82 and Kh-41 Moskit / SS-N-22 Sunburn are all variants of the same 4.5 tonne supersonic rocket-ramjet missile. This weapon is the primary armament of the PLA-N's new 956E Sovremennyy class destroyers and is credited with a range between 50 and 120 nautical miles. More recently it has been integrated on the Project 12421 Molniya class missile boats, which carry four rounds. An air launch centreline tunnel adaptor enables Su-27/30 family strike fighters to carry a single round and this configuration has been displayed on the navalised Su-33, and more recently advertised on the land based Su-35BM Flanker variants. A coastal defence variant labelled the Moskit E is in development, with a two round TEL based on the MZKT-7930 chassis. Inertial midcourse guidance is supplemented with an Altair active radar seeker - there are no reports to date of land attack derivatives. The missile is powered by a Turayevo 3D83 ramjet Unlike subsonic Western anti-ship missiles such as the Harpoon and Exocet, the Moskit is a supersonic sea-skimmer. It can be programmed to fly a high altitude trajectory at Mach 3, or a sea-skimming trajectory at Mach 2.2. If the sea skimming mode is chosen, the missile will be first detected by a warship under attack when it emerges over the horizon at a distance of about 15 to 25 nautical miles. This provides the defences on the ship with about 25-60 seconds of warning time before impact. The raw speed of the Moskit makes it a challenging target for most shipboard defences. All variants use the KTRV-Detal 3A-81E-01 series radar altimeter, similar to the design used in the Kh-59ME / AS-18 Kazoo. Terminal phase approach to targets is at 10 - 20 m AMSL. http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-Cruise-Missiles.html

milstar: «БраМос» возвращает кредиты Григорий АНДРИЯНОВ. http://www.redstar.ru/2011/12/10_12/1_04.html Проведённые на Балтийском море испытания сверхзвуковой крылатой ракеты «БраМос» с борта строящегося для ВМС Индии фрегата убедительно свидетельствуют о том, что эта ракета может использоваться на кораблях российского производства, сообщает Интерфакс-АВН со ссылкой на управляющего содиректора компании «БраМос» Александра Максичёва. «Несколько дней назад были успешно проведены бросковые испытания ракеты «БраМос» на Балтике. Мы первый раз участвуем в оснащении комплексом «БраМос» строящегося в России корабля. Есть определённые трудности, но тем не менее могу сказать, что наша компания ни разу не сорвала своих обязательств, поставляла всё во время, провела своевременно все необходимые монтажные работы и проверки. Бросковые испытания являются тому подтверждением», - заявил А. Максичёв на проходящей в Малайзии Международной военно-морской и авиационно-космической выставке «ЛИМА-2011». Он отметил, что до бросковых испытаний был проведён полный комплекс испытаний на электромагнитную совместимость, в которых принимали участие индийские и российские специалисты. Испытания подтвердили, что комплекс «БраМос» полностью совместим со всеми системами корабля. «Во время ходовых испытаний был проведён электронный пуск ракеты, и мы убедились, что она готова к бросковым испытаниям», - сказал собеседник агентства. Он пояснил, что бросковые испытания проводятся для того, чтобы подтвердить, что все конструктивные решения были правильными, что пуск ракеты не нанесёт ущерб конструкции корабля и корабль выдержит все те воздействия, на которые рассчитан. «Следующий шаг - это сдаточные испытания, стрельба нормальной ракетой. Это будет уже в Индии, когда корабль передадут заказчику и его окончательно примут на вооружение. Надеемся, что эту задачу мы выполним в 2012 году», - сказал А. Максичёв. Он также сообщил, что остальные два фрегата, которые строятся по контракту с Индией на Прибалтийском судостроительном заводе «Янтарь», также будут оснащены сверхзвуковыми крылатыми ракетами «БраМос». Новая российско-индийская крылатая ракета «БраМос» разработана совместным предприятием «БраМос», созданным в 1998 году российским НПО «Машиностроение» и Организацией исследований и разработок (DRDO) при минобороны Индии. Серийное производство ракеты планируется развернуть как в России, так и в Индии. Ракета будет находиться на вооружении российской и индийской армий и широко поставляться на экспорт в третьи страны. Ракета предназначена для уничтожения широкого спектра морских целей. Она характеризуется высокой дальностью полёта (до 290 км), большой сверхзвуковой скоростью (до 2,8 М), мощной боевой нагрузкой (до 250 кг), а также малой заметностью для радаров. Полёт ракеты, вес которой в базовом варианте составляет 3.000 кг, осуществляется в диапазоне высот 10 - 14.000 метров по переменной траектории. В новой ракете на практике реализован принцип «выстрелил и забыл» - цель она находит сама.

milstar: В настоящее время коллеги Льва Петровича по оружейной тематике признают, что его идеи были определяющими при создании зарядов, разработанных в Челябинске70. В частности, так считает заместитель научного руководителя ВНИИ технической физики В.А. Симоненко. В своих воспоминаниях о Феоктистове он говорит: «Поэтому, когда я утверждаю: Лев – один, то имею в виду его уникальность как источника идей, существен ная часть которых уже реализована, а некоторые еще ждут своей очереди. […] По сути дела, то, на чем основываются разработки нашего института, в значительной степени опирается на «Львиные» идеи. И в этом плане, если говорить о персональном влиянии, скажем, Сахарова или Зельдовича на создание ядерного оружия Советского Союза и России – не по времени, а по воплощенным идеям, – я бы впереди поставил именно Льва». #################################### http://www.pircenter.org/data/publications/sirus2/Novikov.pdf

milstar: По информации заместителя генерального конструктора ОКБ им. Микояна А.Белосвета, оно с 1997 г. начало разработку системы выведения на околоземные орбиты космических ЛА с помощью МиГ-31. В основу будет положен опыт, накопленный ОКБ в результате экспериментов по созданию противоспутникового истребителя МиГ-31Д. Коммерческая ракета-носитель РН-С грузоподъёмностью 40-200 кг будет запускаться с МиГ-31Д, летящего на высоте порядка 17000 м со скоростью 3000 км/ч. 40-200 kg na LEO eto 80 -400 kg na dalnosti 8000-1000 km Massa 1 kt yach -17kg Massa 100 kt yabch -92-95 kg (Trident C-4) Она должна разрабатываться ОКБ "Вымпел", специализирующимся на создании УР класса "воздух-воздух". Первый опытный запуск этой РН ожидался в 1999-2000 гг. С 1978 года КБ "Вымпел" разрабатывало противоспутниковую ракету, оснащенную ОБЧ, имеющую возможность стартовать с самолета МиГ-31. Поражение цели вероятно осуществлялась по такой схеме: ракета выводилась на заданную высоту и подрыв БЧ. "...В период 1987-1992 гг. было проведено более 100 пусков противоспутниковой ракеты с МиГ-31Д, причем боевые стрельбы, проведенные А.Фастовцом и Т.Аубакировым в Сары-Шагане, полностью подтвердили готовность комплекса к принятию на вооружение." http://www.paralay.com/mig31m.html Комплекс включает два авиационных носителя, получивших обозначение МиГ-31И, трехступенчатую ракету-носитель, подвешиваемую между гондолами двигателей, а также воздушный командно-измерительный комплекс на базе самолета Ил-76МД. Взлетная масса самолета МиГ-31И с ракетой-носителем составляет 50 т, дальность полета до точки пуска – 600 км, высота точки пуска – от 15 до 18 км, скорость в точке пуска – 2120–2230 км/ч. Длина отсека полезной нагрузки на ракете-носителе составляет 1,4 м при диаметре 0,94 м. Комплекс позволяет выводить на круговую орбиту с наклонением 46° до 160 кг полезной нагрузки на высоту 300 км или до 120 кг на высоту 600 км. Параметры орбиты выведения могут меняться в широких пределах, включая высокие эллиптические, гелиосинхронные, экваториальные, полярные, с наклонением до 115° и т.д.

milstar: http://www.airwar.ru/enc/other/mig31i.html

milstar: Но в проектах «высокого» дизайна уже с 1960-х успешно используется плутоний любой чистоты. Поэтому термин «оружейный плутоний» никакого военного значения не имеет; это – чисто экономический параметр. «Высокий» дизайн существенно дороже «низкого». http://profbeckman.narod.ru/Pluton.files/Glava8.pdf Professor Beckman (ewrej ?) iz MGU ... --------------------------------------------- Dannoe wiskaziwanie bez nauchnogo znachenija ################################# Pu-239 s konzetraziej bolee 97% ispolzuetsja w USA Navy (w-80 ) Pu-239 s konzetraziej 93.3 % w USA Air Force Prichina - Kommanda PLA/PLARB dlitelno w blizosti k boegolowke ############################################## Chem wische konzetrazija Pu-239 (97+ % ) i sootw .nize konzetrazija Pu-240 tem nize radiazija i sootw .wische zdorow'e kommandi ####################################### w Air Force otsustwuet dlitelnaja blizost s Yab ch ,poetomu mozno ispolzowat Pu-239 s bolee nizkoj konzetr. (93.3 % -oruzejnogo kachestwa) i bolee wisokim sod. Pu -240 n March 1982, designers began working on a W80 variant intended for the Navy's Tomahawk program. The W80 Model 0 (W80-0 or Mod 0) used "supergrade" fission fuel, which has less radioactivity, in the primary in place of the conventional plutonium used in the Air Force's version. "Supergrade" is industry parlance for plutonium alloy bearing an exceptionally high fraction of Pu-239 (>95%), leaving a very low amount of Pu-240 which is a gamma emitter in addition to being a high spontaneous fission isotope. ####################################################### Such plutonium is produced from fuel rods that have been irradiated a very short time as measured in MW-Day/Ton burnup. Such low irradiation times limit the amount of additional neutron capture and therefore buildup of alternate isotope products such as Pu-240 in the rod, and also by consequence is considerably more expensive to produce, needing far more rods irradiated and processed for a given amount of plutonium. Submarine crew members routinely operate in close proximity to stored weapons in torpedo rooms, in contrast to the Air Force where exposure to warheads is relatively brief. This justified the additional costs of the premium supergrade alloy used on the Navy weapon. The first models were delivered in December 1983 and the Mod 0 went into full production in March 1984. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W80_(nuclear_warhead) roduction of the W80 was completed by September 1990, although the exact date at which the respective Mod 0 and Mod 1 runs ended is not clear. A total of 1750 Mod 1 and 367 Mod 0 devices were delivered; 1,000 Mod 1 devices were deployed on the original ALCM, another 400 on the later ACM, and 350 Mod 0s on the Tomahawk. -------- Supergrade plutonium The "supergrade" fission fuel, which has less radioactivity, is used in the primary stage of US Navy nuclear weapons in place of the conventional plutonium used in the Air Force's versions. http://www.medlibrary.org/medwiki/Pu-239

milstar: B61 ,340 kt ,diametr 330 mm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlH7OuWiPb4

milstar: http://www.arms-expo.ru/049051051052124050057053048.html ишенный ракетный комплекс "Кабан" (96М6М) создан Челябинским открытым акционерным обществом (ОАО) "Федеральный научно-производственный центр "Станкомаш" на базе существующих метеорологических ракет и обладает высокими имитационными возможностями. Подробнее: http://www.arms-expo.ru/049051051052124050057053048.html МОСКВА, 22 окт - РИА Новости. Расчеты зенитных ракетных систем С-300В впервые в учебно-боевой практике смогли поразить мишени, которые имитировали оперативно-тактические баллистические ракеты, сообщил журналистам в пятницу в Москве начальник зенитных ракетных войск (ЗРВ) Военно-воздушных сил генерал-майор Сергей Попов. "Благодаря кропотливой работе аппаратов зенитных ракетных войск Северо-Западного и Дальневосточного объединений ВВС и ПВО по подготовке зенитных ракетных частей С-300В два полка С-300В впервые смогли справиться с выполнением боевых стрельбы по ракетам-мишеням "Кабан", аналогам оперативно-тактических баллистических ракет". - сказал Попов. "Плотность удара достигала шести целей в минуту, а всего, за две минуты боя, было уничтожено 14 ракет-мишеней - аналогов перспективных средств воздушного нападения вероятного противника", - сказал генерал. "В целом, эффективность боевых стрельб зенитных ракетных частей составила более 85%", - сообщил начальник ЗРВ ВВС. Oсновные характеристики Калибр, мм 250 Длина, м 5,72 Масса, кг 330 Высота подъема, км 46 Дальность точки падения, км до 100 Время работы двигателя, с 4,5-9 Максимальная скорость, м/с 830-1300 Полное время полета, с 185 Подробнее: http://www.arms-expo.ru/049051051052124050057053048.html 250 mm *5720 mm / 1300 met .sec testirowanna yabch kalibrom w 2 raza nize 127 mm ,werojatno wozmozno i dalnejschee snizenie ############################################################### Snizenie klaibra w 2 raza = snizeniju fronatalnoj EPR w 4 raza ili snizeniju max. dalnosti w 1.4 raza ################################################################ Takze za schet snizenija kalibra i wesa mozno poluchit bolee wisokie yskorenija i dalnost #########################################################

milstar: Pershing -2 "user manual" http://pershingmissile.org/PershingDocuments/manuals/TM%209-1425-386-10-1.pdf

milstar: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Giant-Gladiator.html#mozTocId912634 w samom konze tabl A-1 srawnenie Sprint ,9m82m chertez Sprint (do 100 g)

milstar: Analysis 5 The Market for Strike Missiles 2011- 2020 http://www.forecastinternational.com/samples/F660_CompleteSample.pdf Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Market Trends............................................................................................................................................................8 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................9 Market Statistics .....................................................................................................................................................13 Table 1 - The Market for Strike Missiles Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020 ................................................25 Table 2 - The Market for Strike Missiles Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020.................................................31 Figure 1 - The Market for Strike Missiles Unit Production 2011 - 2020 (Bar Graph) ...............................................................................37 Figure 2 - The Market for Strike Missiles Value Statistics 2011 - 2020 (Bar Graph)................................................................................37 Table 3 - The Market for Strike Missiles Unit Production % Market Share by Headquarters/Company 2011 - 2020 ....................................38 Table 4 - The Market for Strike Missiles Value Statistics % Market Share by Headquarters/Company 2011 - 2020.....................................40 Figure 3 - The Market for Strike Missiles Unit Production % Market Share 2011 - 2020 (Pie Chart) ......................................................42 Figure 4 - The Market for Strike Missiles Value Statistics % Market Share 2011 - 2020 (Pie Chart).......................................................42 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................................................43 ***  The following reports are included in this section: (Note: a single report may cover several programs.) AASM Advanced Technology Cruise Missile AGM-65 Maverick AGM-84E SLAM AGM-86A/B AGM-88A/B/C HARM AGM-142A HAVE NAP ALARM ARMA T ARMIGER ASMP/ASLP BrahMos Hsiung Feng I/II International Anti-Radiation Missiles JASSM Modular Stand-Off Weapon NSFS Russian Strike Missiles SCALP Tactical Tomahawk TAURUS Type 80 (ASM-1/ASM-2)/Type 88 SSM-1

milstar: 42 ASMP diameter listed as .35 meters in Norris, Burrows, and Fieldhouse, British, French, and Chinese Nuclear Weapons, p. 287. http://www.cdi.org/nuclear/database/frnukes.html

milstar: According to a 2006 unclassified assessment by the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence, “China is equipping theater ballistic missiles [TBMs] with maneuvering reentry vehicles (MaRVs) with radar or IR [infrared] seekers to provide the accuracy necessary to attack a ship at sea.”2 If viable, such missiles, with “high-reentry speed (Mach 10–12) [and] radical maneuvers,” would be ex- traordinarily difficult to defend against, whatever ballistic missile defense the United States might deploy.3 Targeting a carrier with submunitions could enable China to render it operationally ineffective without sinking it, thereby achieving its objectives with a (perceived) lower risk of escalation. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Glupo ... USA budut bombit territoriju Kitaja silami morskoj aviazii ,a Kitaj budet attakowat avianoszi bez togo ,chtobi ix potopit -"ymenchit risk eskalazii" Scenarij kotorij xotjat USA Woennaya maxima - Nawjazat protivniku tu wojnu ,kotoruj on ne xochet ############################################## Soot. Kitaj dolzen stremitsja ynichtozit protivnika ! ################################# If not countered effec- tively, the very impression of such a risk might deter carrier strike groups from entering the region in the first place (figure 1). http://andrewserickson.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/erickson-article_erickson-yang_china-asbm_nwcr_2009-autumn-aspx.pdf According to Chinese sources, a Chinese DF-21 ASBM would be based in part on the U.S. Pershing II (left), as is the DF-15 short-range ballistic missile (center). The U.S. Pershing II has adjustable control fins on its reentry vehicle for terminal maneuver. ########################################################## Positively identified photos of a CSS-5 outside its launch canister are not known to exist. But the DF-15B missile pictured here has a reentry vehicle virtually identical to the Pershing II’s. Based on the strong visual resem- blance, it is possible that the DF-15B employs terminal maneuvering technology similar to that of the Pershing II. The reentry vehicle that China obviously has here could easily be mated with a variant of the DF-21/CSS-5 booster (right), which might then produce an effective ASBM. (Photos used with permission from China Defense Forum) FIGURE 4 SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF ASBM FLIGHT TRAJECTORY WITH MIDCOURSE AND TERMINAL GUIDANCE Technological Feasibility: Convergence and Divergence of Views. Chinese doc- trinal debates about the utility of ASBMs are closely related to widespread dis- agreements over their technical feasibility. Analysts generally concur that five major technical challenges must be surmounted to achieve a functioning ASBM: detection, tracking, penetration of target defenses, hitting a moving target, and causing sufficient damage (figure 4). Detection: Pessimists claim that carriers are too small relative to the potential search area to be easily detected by satellite images. Optimists maintain that carriers—with their broad constellation of electromagnetic signals—can be de- tected in a variety of ways, such as with space-borne sensors. Tracking: Skeptics maintain that requisite satellite coverage is unattainable, as are sufficient naval vessels and surveillance craft, as well as overseas bases for signals intelligence. They believe that China’s other tracking methods are inadequate, even in aggregate. Strangely, they seem to overlook the possibility that China’s combination of land-based radars and satellites—perhaps aug- mented temporarily with deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles and launches of (micro)satellites—might be sufficient to track and target carrier strike groups within a certain zone off China’s coastal waters from which it believed essential to exclude them in combat.74 Both Chinese and Western sources, for instance, suggest that China already has relevant over-the-horizon (OTH) backscatter sky-wave and OTH surface-wave radars.75 Target defense penetration: The claims of skeptics that slowing the warhead for terminal guidance makes it prohibitively vulnerable to interception seem unpersuasive based on known physics principles. A wide variety of Chinese sources suggest using multiaxis saturation attacks (e.g., involving submarine- launched cruise missiles as well) to overwhelm CSG defenses, apparently with- out acknowledging the difficulty of coordinating them. Hitting a moving target: How to strike a CSG that moves during the processes of location, data transmission, and ASBM delivery? Skeptics contend that bal- listic missiles are less accurate than cruise missiles and that while a ballistic missile’s trajectory is fixed, its target is mobile and may escape between launch and impact. But researchers at the Second Artillery Engineering College main- tain that as long as the initial ASBM trajectory is reasonably accurate, appro- priate homing corrections can be made. Other researchers suggest improving precision with passive radiation homing and by activating terminal guidance at higher altitude to allow the seeker to scan a larger sea area. One researcher rec- ommends selecting opportune moments for attack: “Even a tiger takes a nap [老 虎也有打盹的时候].”76 Thus, they contend, carriers can be targeted when flight operations or at-sea replenishment impede their mobility. Causing sufficient damage: While a few experts make a show of detailing car- rier damage-control equipment, one wonders from their tone if they are not being a bit disingenuous. The conventional wisdom seems to be that a multiaxis saturation attack (to defeat defenses) or submunitions (to distribute damage), delivered accurately, can achieve a mission kill by targeting critical exposed ar- eas, such as the carrier’s aircraft, island, or C4ISR* equipment. Two Chinese observers estimate the unit cost of an ASBM and its launcher to be $5–$10.5 million

milstar: http://www.brookings.edu/about/projects/archive/nucweapons/skybolt Skybolt was an effort by the Air Force to utilize B-52 bombers as ballistic missile launchers. As originally conceived, Skybolt was to have been a 39 foot (11.9 meter) , 11,000 pound (5,000 kilogram), two-stage missile with a range of some 950 nautical miles (1,759 kilometers) when dropped from a B-52 at a height of 40,000 feet (12,192 meters). At maximum range, it would reach its target in approximately 12 minutes.

milstar: Very Long Range Munition — Air Breather (VLRM-AB) ATK is developing the ramjet propulsion system for the Very Long Range Munition – Air Breather (VLRM-AB) ramjet-assisted artillery projectile. Assisting guided projectiles with ramjet propulsion will enhance platform survivability by increasing standoff range and improve call-for-fire responsiveness through shorter flight time. VLRM-AB for 155mm artillery provides the U.S. Army with extended-range fire capability, precision, and lethality. For the Navy, VLRM-AB can facilitate the long-range naval surface fire support requirement using the five-inch gun. Ramjet assisted projectile technology is scaleable to other calibers, including 105mm projectiles for the Army and 155mm projectiles for the Navy’s Advanced Gun System. ATK is the world leader in the development of hypervelocity and air-breathing propulsion systems. In 2004, the X-43 hypersonic flight vehicle built by ATK for NASA set the world speed record for air-breathing powered flight at Mach 10 or nearly 7,000 miles per hour. ATK is also designing and developing scramjet propulsion engines for the X-51 Robust Scramjet program, a U.S. Air Force initiative to advance the state of the art for liquid hydrocarbon and hydrogen-fueled scramjet propulsion systems. http://www.atk.com/capabilities_defense/cs_ms_w_hs_vlrm-ab.asp Hypersonic High-Speed Strike Weapon (HSSW) ATK is developing a Hypersonic High-Speed Strike Weapon (HSSW) in response to the Department of Defense’s need for a rapid strike weapon. The design for the HSSW uses ATK’s solid rocket motor capabilities to boost the weapon to Mach 4, where a scramjet engine engages to accelerate to speeds approaching Mach 5. The HSSW can be launched from bombers, fighter jets, submarines, and surface ships. The scramjet acceleration capability of the HSSW builds on ATK’s success with the X-43A Scramjet, which owns the world speed record for air-breathing powered flight at Mach 10 or nearly 7,000 miles per hour. Flying at half that speed, the HSSW can fly 400 miles in eight minutes. -------------------------------------- In comparison, a cruise missile flying at a top speed of Mach 0.8 will take an hour to reach the same target. http://www.atk.com/capabilities_defense/cs_ss_m_hhssw.asp 640 km za 480 sek s M5 dlja srawnenija ballisticheskaja raketa na minimialno -zatratnoj traektorii 1000 km 560 sek 260 km apogej 2000 km 790 sek 490 km 3000 km 990 sek 700 km

milstar: Aug. 20, 1998, when the USS Abraham Lincoln Battle Group, stationed in the Arabian Sea, launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at an Al Qaeda training camp in eastern Afghanistan, hoping to take out Osama Bin Laden. With a top speed of 550 mph, the Tomahawks made the 1100-mile trip in 2 hours. By then, Bin Laden was gone—missed by less than an hour, according to Richard A. Clarke, former head of U.S. counterterrorism. Read more: Hypersonic Cruise Missile: America's New Global Strike Weapon - Popular Mechanics

milstar: KB Arsenal MBR Vereniza http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/VERENICA.pdf dlina rakei -11.4 metra diametr -1.28 metra ves -13.5 tonni



полная версия страницы